Skip to main content
Case studies

What changed.Concretely.

Nine engagements, nine measured results
  1. 01NDA process automated without adding a tool75 min10 min
  2. 02Auto-resolution of subsidiary requests71%
  3. 03Contract mapping and tracking87 k€
  4. 04A contract chain without buying a CLM22 j8,7 j
  5. 05Executive committee reporting built around decisions10 j3 j
  6. 06Matter intake redesign45 min8 min
  7. 07Case and procedural-deadline tracking−23 j
  8. 08Procedural-document production redesign−72%
  9. 09Refocusing the firm on the matters that count+11 %

  1. 01
    75 min → 10 min
    • Process
    • Tech

    NDA process automated without adding a tool

    French subsidiary of an international healthcare group · 20 to 40 NDAs per month · Google Workspace

    What we changed

    • NDA process automated inside Google Workspace, the environment already in place
    • No new CLM, no additional licence
    • Processing time: 75 → 10 minutes per NDA, a 87% reduction
    • 260 to 520 hours a year of potentially recoverable legal capacity, on 20 to 40 NDAs per month
  2. 02
    71%
    • Process
    • Tech

    Auto-resolution of subsidiary requests

    European pharma group · 1,200 people · in-house legal of 7

    What we changed

    • Compliance intake structured
    • Q&A agent on group documentation base
    • Automatic triage and routing: 71% of subsidiary requests resolved without human intervention
    • Time to first response: 2.3 days → 4 hours
  3. 03
    87 k€
    • Data
    • Process

    Contract mapping and tracking

    Agri-food mid-cap · 450 people · Maghreb + France · 1-person legal

    What we changed

    • Centralized contract repository with metadata
    • Expiration alerts at 90/60/30 days
    • Dashboard exposed to CFO
    • 14 tacit renewals avoided in the first year: €87k of commitments that would have renewed without a decision
  4. 04
    22 j → 8,7 j
    • Process
    • Tech

    A contract chain without buying a CLM

    European B2B services group · 700 business users · Legal team of 4 · Microsoft 365

    What we changed

    • Request form, generation, approval, DocuSign signature and archiving, inside Microsoft 365
    • Standard contract cycle: 22 → 8.7 days
    • Requests sent by email: 45% → 9%
    • Standard contracts generated from the flow: 0 → 58%
  5. 05
    10 j → 3 j
    • Data
    • Strategy

    Executive committee reporting built around decisions

    French healthcare group · 2,800 people · 9 countries · Legal team of 8 · Power BI

    What we changed

    • Reporting rebuilt around five decisions the committee can actually take
    • Slides: 26 → 9; indicators shown: 18 → 6
    • Preparation for each committee: 10 → 3 days
    • An “expected decisions” section in every committee
  6. 06
    45 min → 8 min
    • Acquire

    Matter intake redesign

    Law firm · Paris · 12 partners · business law

    What we changed

    • Client intake process redesigned
    • Conflict check centralized on Sheets
    • Automatic engagement letter generation
    • Around 200 partner hours saved over the year
  7. 07
    −23 j
    • Produce
    • Measure

    Case and procedural-deadline tracking

    Law firm · Lyon · 6 partners · 35 staff

    What we changed

    • Dashboard tracking cases and deadlines
    • Automated client reminders on missing documents
    • Average handling time: 94 → 71 days
    • Files with missing documents: 38% → 9%
  8. 08
    −72%
    • Produce
    • Knowledge

    Procedural-document production redesign

    Law firm · 4 partners · South of France

    What we changed

    • Templates connected to a structured form
    • Document generation and filing in one click
    • Production time: 18 → 5 minutes per document
    • Around 450 staff hours saved over the year
  9. 09
    +11 %
    • Bill
    • Measure

    Refocusing the firm on the matters that count

    Business law firm · Paris · 14 partners · about 1,100 matters a year

    What we changed

    • Client value, profitability and complexity matrix to set the seniority level of each matter
    • Matters over budget: 42% → 19%
    • Hours on the least profitable matters: 31% → 18%
    • Margin on tracked matters: +11%

Clients are not named. The context given situates the engagement without identifying the organisation.

Does one of theselook like yours?

One hour to test these figures against your own data, and see what would apply to you.

Let’s talk about yours

No commitment.

The model each engagement was read through: the system of a legal department, the path of a matter inside a firm. And how we step in: the Pills. method.